Harbhajan Singh Questions Shami’s Exclusion from ODIs
Former India off-spinner Harbhajan Singh has sparked a fresh debate in Indian cricket circles after voicing strong criticism against the national team management for what he described as the “unfair sidelining” of senior pacer Mohammed Shami from the One Day International (ODI) setup. His remarks have come at a time when Shami continues to deliver impactful spells in domestic tiger exchange cricket, raising questions about his exclusion despite consistent performances and vast international experience.
Harbhajan Calls for Transparency in Selection Decisions
Harbhajan, known for openly expressing his opinions on cricketing decisions, did not hold back during a recent media interaction. He argued that a bowler of Shami’s calibre deserves a more prominent role in India’s ODI plans, especially with major international tournaments always around the corner. According to him, leaving out a proven match-winner without a transparent explanation creates confusion among fans and sends the wrong message to players who rely on performances to earn national call-ups.
Shami’s All-Round Skills Highlighted by Harbhajan
The former spinner highlighted that Shami has repeatedly shown his ability to swing the ball both ways, maintain pressure in the middle overs, and deliver crucial breakthroughs at the death. “A bowler like Shami is a rare asset,” Harbhajan reportedly said. “He has performed on flat pitches, under pressure, and against the best batting line-ups in the world. When someone like him keeps proving himself, yet does not get picked for ODIs, it raises serious questions about the selection process.”
Shami’s Outstanding Domestic Form Strengthens His Case
Shami, who has long been regarded as one of India’s premier fast bowlers across formats, has indeed been in impressive form in domestic competitions over the past few weeks. Despite recovering from injuries and workload-related breaks earlier in the year, he has looked sharp and rhythmical, consistently picking wickets with his trademark seam movement and clever variations. His recent spells in domestic one-day tournaments have not only brought him success but have also reinforced his readiness for international cricket.
Domestic Performances Showcase Shami’s Continued Excellence
Sources from domestic circuits say Shami has been bowling with the same intensity he displays in international matches. On multiple occasions, he has dismantled top-order batters with his early swing and has shown remarkable control, even during high-pressure chases. His economical bowling at the death overs has further strengthened the argument that he still has plenty to contribute to India’s white-ball plans.
Balancing Youth and Experience: Harbhajan’s Key Argument
Harbhajan’s criticism also touches upon a broader pattern of team management opting for younger bowlers or experimenting with fresh combinations, which, while understandable, must be balanced with the need to retain experience. He argued that grooming new talent should not come at the expense of sidelining dependable veterans who continue to perform. “Experience and youth should go hand in hand,” he said. “You cannot just discard a player who has been your match-winner for years. Shami brings mental toughness, skill, and experience of playing big tournaments—qualities you cannot replace overnight.”
Fans and Analysts Support Shami’s Return to ODIs
Fans and cricket analysts have echoed similar sentiments, questioning the rationale behind excluding Shami from ODIs, especially when India occasionally struggles with consistency in the pace department. Many believe that Shami’s presence would add depth and stability, complementing bowlers like Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj. His proven ability to adapt to different conditions makes him a valuable asset in overseas tours as well.
Workload Management or Unfair Exclusion? Mixed Signals Emerge
However, some sources close to team management suggest that the decision to rest Shami from ODIs is part of a long-term workload management strategy. Given his central role in Test cricket and the desire to keep him fit for marquee events, selectors may be choosing to rotate him or limit his involvement in ODIs. But Harbhajan rejected this reasoning, stating that if fitness is not a concern—as Shami’s domestic performances indicate—then selection should be purely based on merit. “If he is fit enough to play domestic cricket and perform at that level, he is fit enough to play ODIs too,” he noted.
Debate Gains Momentum as Fans Demand Clarity from BCCI
The debate has now gained momentum on social media. With thousands of fans expressing support for Shami and demanding clarity from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Cricket enthusiasts argue that while rotation is important, communication and justification are equally necessary to avoid confusion and maintain trust in the selection process.
Future Uncertain as Pressure Mounts on Selectors
As the discussion intensifies. If he continues to dominate at the domestic level, pressure may continue to mount for his reinstatement.
Conclusion
For now, Harbhajan Singh’s outspoken remarks have reignited a crucial conversation about fairness, transparency. And the value of experience in India’s cricketing structure. One that is likely to continue until clear answers or decisive actions emerge.